有很多偏向于掩盖顺势疗法的偏见’具有治疗慢性疾病的强大能力。间接增加偏见清单的情况是“write-off” by a conventional physician, even when homoeopathy could actually cure. But more often than not, it is a blind belief in the 注销 which actually results out of conviction with which the patient is made to believe. Another fallout of this situation is that one realises the value of homoeopathic treatment after losing the precious time when the treatment could have been most effective. 通过 all this, I mean to say that homoeopathy is far more effective in many cases that are generally termed as “incurables”如果正确使用并及时使用。但是，必须有“incurables”顺势疗法！
第二个最重要的偏见是顺势疗法是“slow”. Often I have seen that it is this kind of silly syllogism that supports it ? if homoeopathy is 车辆慢行 in treating asthma, a chronic disease, it is going to be 车辆慢行 in treating every chronic disease! Funny logic! Isn?t it? Another reason is that the time involved is compared with that of conventional system of medicine, little realising that the level at which homoeopathy works is way apart as it aims at rooting out the disease and not suppressing it.
Homoeopathy is neither 车辆慢行 nor fast. It is a natural system, obeys the laws of nature and takes optimum time to cure. Well, the treatment of chronic diseases depends on innumerable factors patient compliance, extent and intensity of damage, age, nature of previous therapies, the physician?s competence, etc.
此功能（由Vikas Sharma博士撰写）早些时候发表在《论坛报》（北印度最大的发行日报）上。 Vikas Sharma博士是The Tribune的常规顺势疗法专栏作家，您可以在以下位置将其邮寄 [email protected]